How to Start Investing
The #1 Characteristic of a Great Investor
Want to invest in Agriculture? Moo!
How to Invest “Green” With ETFs
The #1 Buy and Hold Investor of All Time
The Secret to Buy and Hold Success
Got a Buy and Hold Story? Tell Tracey
Feel Fabulous While Investing By Going “Green”
NBC is doing “Green” week on all of its networks so I thought this would be a good time to discuss how you, as an investor, can invest in companies that are contributing to the environment (instead of destroying it.)
Before the advent of ETFs, you either had to invest in a mutual fund that sort of invested in the areas you were interested in, or you had to invest in specific companies themselves. But who knows which companies are all that good in, say, solar power? That’s why “green” ETFs are a smart play.
Powershares has started several ETFs that directly invest in several “green” areas such as energy conservation, water, and alternative energies.
Cleantech Portfolio (Ticker PZD)
The Cleantech Portfolio ETF focuses on companies engaging in energy conservation and efficiency. The portfolio was introduced in October of 2006. Since inception, the fund is up 28.76% compared to the Nasdaq at 15.21% and the S&P 500 at 12.83% during that time period. From the Powershares website:
The PowerShares Cleantech Portfolio (Fund) tracks the Cleantech Index™, which is designed to identify cleantech companies with the greatest capital appreciation potential within the cleantech industry. A company is considered to be part of the cleantech industry if it produces any knowledge-based product or service that improves operation, performance, productivity or efficiency, while reducing costs, inputs, energy consumption, waste or pollution.
The portfolio holds 48 different companies including First Solar, Siemens, Tetra Tech and Corning from six different sectors. Those sectors include: Utilities, Materials, Information Technology, Industrials, Health Care and Energy. The information technology sector is among the larger sectors, probably because those companies are trying to formulate new energy conservation and efficiency methods. There are also quite a few solar energy companies.
Water Resources Portfolio (Ticker PHO)
I’ve talked a lot about water in recent weeks. Clearly, it’s going to be an important resource for the world going forward. Since inception in December 2005, the Water Resource Portfolio is up 21.42% compared to the S&P 500 up 13.04% and the Dow Jones Utility Index up 12.61%. From the Powershares website:
The PowerShares Water Resources Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Palisades Water Index™. The Index seeks to identify a group of companies that focus on the provision of potable water, the treatment of water, and the technology and services that are directly related to water consumption. The modified equal weighted portfolio is rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.
The portfolio holds 35 companies with its largest holding being Tetra Tech. It also holds such mainstays such as General Electric and Emerson Electric. I think it’s hard to come up with “water” companies, per say. If you’re cleaning the water or somehow involved in consuming it, you get in the ETF.
WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (Ticker PBW)
This seems to be among the more popular of their “green” ETFs. This ETF invests in those seeking out alternative energy sources. Since its inception in March 2005, its up 15.73% compared to the Nasdaq at 11.11% and the S&P 500 up 11.45%. From the Powershares website:
The PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (Fund) seeks to replicate, before fees and expenses, the WilderHill Clean Energy Index, which is designed to deliver capital appreciation through the selection of companies that focus on greener and generally renewable sources of energy and technologies that facilitate cleaner energy.
The portfolio’s largest holding is Sun Power Corp. It has 42 holdings, many of them in solar, battery and alternative fuel companies. But the portfolio also holds such common names as Applied Materials and Air Products & Chemicals.
This is the portfolio for you if you are really interested in investing in alternative energy plays such as solar power.
WilderHill Progressive Energy Portfolio (Ticker PUW)
This portfolio differs from the Clean Energy ETF in that it invests in companies that are trying to move away from the use of fossil fuels- such as Toyota with its electric cars. Toyota is one of the portfolio’s holdings. Much of the portfolio emphasizes alternatives to oil and gas use. The portfolio is up 17.74% since its inception in October 2006, compared with the 15.21% gain in the Nasdaq and the 12.83% gain in the S&P 500 during the same period of time. From the Powershares website:
The PowerShares WilderHill Progressive Energy Portfolio (Fund) is based on the WilderHill Progressive Energy Index. The Index is comprised U.S.-listed companies that are significantly involved in transitional energy bridge technologies, with an emphasis on improving the use of fossil fuels. The modified equal-weighted portfolio is rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.
Fuel Tech Inc is the fund’s largest holding. Out of the 47 holdings, you’ll find some common names like Honda, Johnson & Johnson and Energizer Holdings Inc. There are also a bunch of uranium and semiconductor companies.
Which one is right for you?
It depends on what your investment goals are. The Water Resources Portfolio is heavily weighted in industrial companies (over 65% of the portfolio) and utlities (another 16%). Investing in it might not be getting you the “true” water companies you really want to invest in.
The ETFs with the greatest trading volume are the Water Resources Portfolio (PHO) and the WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (PBW). Both pay a slight dividend (under 1%.)
The WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio is probably closer to what most people think of when they think of investing in “green” companies. These are the companies that are on the cutting edge for solar power, electric power, wind power and anything that is an alternative to oil and gas. If you’re interested in trying to save the earth from global warming (and hate Big Oil and filling up your gas tank every week)- then the Clean Energy Portfolio is for you.
Is “green” a passing fad? Not likely. I think it’s here to stay. There is only so much oil to go around and we’ve seen what fossil fuel consumption can do to our environment. But you should be careful in what companies you invest in. Green is “hot” right now. For instance, First Solar, in several of the portfolios (Ticker: FSLR), has soared from $23 to $159 in the last 52 weeks. It is up again just today as they just announced the they signed $1 billion dollars worth of contracts. The stock, however, is trading at a nose-bleed 167 times earnings. It’s clearly not for the faint of heart. Beware!
But overall, ETFs are a good way to diversify into the “green” investing arena- and to make money while doing so.
4 Responses to “Feel Fabulous While Investing By Going “Green””
Leave a Reply
Clueless - Comments from the Chat Rooms
-
Depression is the rule of ...
-
It's hard for true believers ...
-
Potash Corporation (POT) has seen ...
-
First Solar (FSLR), one of ...
-
Starbucks shareholders are feeling the ...
Links
- 24/7 Wall Street
- Abnormal Returns
- Alpha Trends
- Brain Droppings
- Crib Chatter
- Crossing Wall Street
- Free Money Finance
- In the Money
- Millionaire Now
- Random Roger's Big Picture
- Seeking Alpha
- Sharebuilder
- The Big Picture
- The Housing Bubble Blog
- The Kirk Report
- The Simple Dollar
- Ticker Sense
- WSJ's MarketBeat
- Zacks Investments
Categories
- Branding (13)
- Buffett (4)
- Buy and Hold (5)
- careers (19)
- Chicago housing (5)
- Collectibles (3)
- Comments from the Chit Chat room (25)
- commodities (49)
- Creative Class (1)
- Credit Crunch (23)
- DC housing (2)
- Debt (4)
- Federal Reserve (2)
- finance (24)
- Florida housing (1)
- Global Economy (10)
- gold (6)
- Guest Bloggers (1)
- hedge funds (1)
- housing (63)
- housing bubble (28)
- inflation (17)
- investing (87)
- Investing 101 (5)
- Investing Techniques (1)
- money (59)
- Press (1)
- Recession (5)
- San Francisco Housing (1)
- stocks (50)
- Tech stocks (4)
- Uncategorized (42)
- Water (3)
- Weak Dollar (1)
Archives
Disclaimer
Mom and Pop Investors LLC is an independent publisher. Mom and Pop Investors LLC is not a registered investment advisor. Please consult your investment professional before making any investment decision. Sources of information are deemed reliable but they are in no way guaranteed to be complete or without error. The Editor may have positions in and may from time to time buy or sell any security mentioned herein. Past results are no guarantee of future performance.















November 7th, 2007 at 2:16 am
I think your use of referring to people’s daily living on earth as “destroying [the environment]” is several magnitudes over the top. There are very few things that humanity does that is destructive of “the environment,” but several of the good-intentioned acts that are promulgated by the “greenies” are indeed exacerbating “the environment.” (Scare quotes are necessary, because “the enironment” is ethereal to even “experts” like AlGore.)
Recycling paper and glass are two losers. Any company engaged in these dubious enterprises is bound to fail, and pollute “the environment” further.
Carbon credits? Please. CO2 and associated anthropogenic GH gasses are miniscule in comparison to natural, Gaia-produced sources. The Gore-acle is a huckster, and “green” companies are just profiting from ignorance and blissful stupidity.
November 7th, 2007 at 3:06 pm
As an investor your goal is to “profit”, right? If everyone is using some sort of new technology or product, even though it’s meaningless, that doesn’t mean there won’t be profit in it.
I’m trying to give investors options in which to invest “green”- for better or worse- because that’s what investors want to do right now. (”Stupidity” or not.)
Pet rocks were pretty darn stupid. But someone got rich.
November 8th, 2007 at 4:52 am
Tracey, I really hate to be contentious, but:
“…that’s what investors want to do right now.
No, that is what some investors want to do right now, including such infamous entities as CALPERS, which has divested itself of tobacco companies, but embraces totalitarian regimes (such as Hugo Chavez’s Venezuelan Citgo oil company).
You are probably correct. A plurality of investors is willing to entertain the farce of anthropogenic GW to profit from the ignorance, but it doesn’t make a lick of sense in the medium- or long-term ranges, because it is based on deceit and BS.
Further, you posit:
“Pet rocks were pretty darn stupid. But someone got rich.”
Exactly. “Someone.” Key phrase there is “one.” It was a fad that had no added value…no economic impetus to the greater body of society. One, or two, or three, or even ten, people got fabulously wealthy from that boondoggle, but it didn’t add a dadgum thing to GDP or GNP.
“Green” is the same thing. There are *some* people willing to pay more for the illusion of Gaia-friendly products, but even those dupes will get a clue in time, and the entire house of cards will come crashing down.
Witness the ethanol subterfuge…it is all just another method of enriching agricultural interests. And that crap will continue for some time. Buy more ADM, because my tax dollars will make that stock rocket, unless Congress reforms the agricultural subsidy programs. That’s highly unlikely, so direct your clients into this stock post-haste.
My sarcasm is probably misdirected, but I loathe the idea of people being misled by shucksters like AlGore&Co.
November 8th, 2007 at 7:19 pm
I don’t want to get into a discussion about Al Gore and global warming and all of that. It’s basically irrelevant from an investor’s standpoint because they just want to know: will this company make me money?
Some of the “green” ETFs mentioned here own companies like Toyota (for their hybrid cars) and Chesapeake Energy (for their natural gas alternative) and I don’t think I would consider either of those to be “fads” either (that will fade away anytime soon.)
Perhaps the emphasis on solar and wind power might prove fleeting. But who’s to know? Many people called the personal computer a fad in the 1980s. Many people also called the internet the same thing in the 1990s.
You would have made gobs of money off of either of those “fads.”
So, again, I’m fine with making money off of being “green”. You don’t have to support the movement to benefit financially.
That being said, in the same vein, you can also continue to invest in tobacco companies and continue to make gobs of money that way too. I’m an equal opportunity investor myself.